Goldberg & Associates, which was once at the forefront of advocating for Parental Alienation (PA) theory, has undergone a significant paradigm shift to become one of its most vocal critics. This transition is rooted in deep scientific inquiry and ethical considerations, as outlined on our website.
The primary critique of PA theory lies in its lack of diagnostic clarity. It has not been established as a mental disorder in children, and often, the behaviors attributed to PA are more accurately explained by other conditions, including abuse. Despite nearly four decades of efforts to establish effective therapeutic interventions for PA, these have largely been unsuccessful, pointing to a fundamental misdiagnosis. This viewpoint is reinforced by the DSM and ICD’s consistent rejection of PA as a mental disorder, a stance echoed by William Bernet, the leader of the Parental Alienation Study Group.
The 2009 conference on PA, organized by Joseph Goldberg, featured Dr. Michael Bone, who presented compelling evidence against the efficacy of reunification therapy in cases of parental alienation. Dr. Bone explicitly stated that reunification therapy had failed in all cases of parental alienation and advised against its use. Despite this, many parents continue to pursue such therapies, often unaware of their ineffectiveness and potential harm.
In response to these shortcomings, some mental health professionals have developed psychoeducational models as an experimental approach to addressing a child’s rejection. However, these programs, such as Family Bridges and Turning Points for Families, not only bear a significant cost but also raise concerns about confirmatory bias due to their frequent review by other PA advocates.
Goldberg & Associates now advocates for dissociative disorders as a more accurate framework for understanding a child’s rejection of a parent. This approach is substantiated by the association of self-injuring behaviors, commonly comorbid with dissociation, in children subjected to extreme alienating behavior.
Our perspective is further informed by multidisciplinary research, including studies in self-control, self-regulation, stress, and the Predictive Mind theory related to unconscious mechanisms. These dimensions offer a comprehensive view of the complexities involved in high-conflict family situations, which PA theory has largely overlooked.
In summary, Goldberg & Associates’ reevaluation of PA theory signifies our commitment to more holistic, scientifically grounded approaches in high-conflict custody cases. Our website serves as a comprehensive resource, offering insights and evidence-based solutions beyond the traditional confines of PA theory. We aim to provide a deeper understanding and more effective strategies for those grappling with these challenging family dynamics.